anjelica huston imdb

[…] In case of your example, not harming the pregnant woman would be prioritised over globally gaining chocolate bars, such that the overall better outcome rests always on preventing … Since rule-consequentialism can tell people to follow this simpler and less demanding code, even when following it will not to maximise expected good, rule-consequentialism escapes collapse into practical equivalence to act-consequentialism. According to this chapter's arguments, rule‐consequentialism need not be guilty of either collapse into extensional equivalence with act‐consequentialism or incoherence. each one is born (approximately previously as selfish as the one before (hooker) - the more exceptions there are to the rules the higher are the costs of internalisation But we are not thereby forced to collapse the distinction between deontology and consequentialism, so long as we can distinguish the two possible ways the relative priority might work out.

Rule consequentialism is a theory that is sometimes seen as an attempt to reconcile deontology and consequentialism—and in some cases, this is stated as a criticism of rule consequentialism. Some key issues are (1) whether rule-consequentialism is guilty of collapsing into act-consequentialism or, if not, whether it can still be a coherent view, (2) whether rule-consequentialism can adequately deal with cases where these is only partial compliance with the ideal set of rules, (3) whether rule-consequentialism is overly demanding, and (4) whether rule-consequentialism can … 1 All page references within the text are to Brad Hooker, ‘The Collapse of Virtue Ethics’, this volume. The Collapse of Virtue Ethics - Volume 14 Issue 1 - Brad Hooker.

From our perspective, there are other considerations coupled with Consequentialism to complement it, such as: 1. The consequentialist version of the view would say that one has reason to act honestly because of the antecedent desirability of being oneself honest.

For instance, most people would agree that lying is wrong. Utilitarianism is one of the best known and most influential moral theories. 3 Re-reading the relevant bits of On Virtue Ethics , I was embarrassed to discover that this is an all-too-understandable mistake. Act‐consequentialism recommends that our procedure for making moral decisions employs rules very like the ones endorsed by rule‐consequentialism. For example, rule utilitarianism is the same as rule consequentialism except rule utilitarianism specifies that decisions should follow rules promoting the most good, instead of the more general assertion that rules should promote a certain desired outcome. To the extent that rule-consequentialism circumvents collapse, this theory is accused of incoherence.